Post by firefolk on Jun 23, 2009 10:44:03 GMT -5
According to my by no means negligible erudition upon the subject which is to form the topic of the following remarks, it is irrefutable that it is ourselves of whom it must and shall have been said that it was we whereby those personages whereof the predication has been made that they were we, shall have in turn been those of whom it can hardly be denied that it falls upon those particular individuals (obviously) to bear the incumbency and onus--as it were--of the foregoing particularities as enumerated in the immediately preceding remarks. This being the case, it must be established that we shall therefore be called upon, and that presently, to undertake said endeavours in order that it might be those of us of whom it is NOT with rectitude to be contended that they were other than ourselves, who shall be the persons other than culpable for such an eventuality, should that exigent condition happen to arise. I trust that you concur?
